Big Theme: Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that President Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs were unlawful. The Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize a president to impose broad, across-the-board tariffs.
Chief Justice Roberts wrote that IEEPA’s language allowing the president to “regulate … importation” cannot support tariffs of unlimited scope, duration, and size. In short: the law does not give that power.
This ruling wipes out the legal foundation for the 10% baseline tariff and the country-specific tariffs that ranged up to 50%. It does not automatically eliminate other tariffs created under Section 301 or Section 232 authorities.
Why This Matters
More than $100 billion was collected under these IEEPA tariffs. That money is now in legal limbo.
For importers, this opens the door to refunds. But the Court did not provide guidance on how refunds will work. Trade lawyers expect a complex process: administrative corrections, individual lawsuits, or potentially a federal refund framework that may take time to build.
Retailers and brands that absorbed tariff costs — or passed them through as price increases — now face a second wave of complexity. If refunds arrive months or years from now, pricing, margin, and inventory decisions made during tariff volatility may need to be re-evaluated.
There is also a financial market forming around these claims. Hedge funds are already buying tariff refund rights from importers at a discount, effectively betting on how messy and slow the refund process will be.
What Hasn’t Changed
Other tariff authorities remain intact.
Section 301 (China-focused tariffs) and Section 232 (national security tariffs) are untouched. Those remain in place.
And within hours of the ruling, the administration announced a new 10% tariff under Section 122 — a Cold War-era statute that allows temporary tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days to address balance-of-payments deficits.
That move is almost certain to trigger new legal challenges.
Tariff policy volatility is not over.
What To Do Now
If you are an importer:
Audit your exposure under IEEPA specifically. Separate it cleanly from 301 and 232 exposure. Documentation will matter.
If you paid tariffs directly to customs, engage trade counsel to understand refund timelines and filing windows. Some refund mechanisms have strict deadlines.
If you operate in retail or marketplaces:
Reassess pricing assumptions that were built around “permanent” cost increases. The removal of IEEPA tariffs may create temporary margin relief, but new tariffs under Section 122 could reintroduce pressure.
Inventory strategy also deserves a reset. If tariff whiplash caused you to delay POs or shift sourcing, this is a moment to scenario-plan again.
Bigger Picture Signal
This is a structural shift in executive trade authority.
The Court drew a clear line: emergency powers cannot be stretched into broad trade policy tools without explicit congressional authorization.
At the same time, the administration is signaling it will test other legal avenues. Section 122 has never been used this way. That means more litigation, more uncertainty, and continued policy swings.
For operators, the lesson remains consistent: trade policy is no longer background noise. It is an operational variable.
And for now, volatility remains the baseline.
From Cost Center to Competitive Advantage: Modernizing Reverse Logistics With AI
(McKinsey & Company)
McKinsey’s latest take is direct: returns are no longer a back-office nuisance. With AI, reverse logistics can shift from margin drag to margin driver.
Returns have ballooned with e-commerce growth. In many categories, especially apparel and consumer electronics, return rates are now structurally higher than in-store retail ever experienced. Processing, inspection, restocking, liquidation, and disposal all stack up into a hidden P&L leak.
McKinsey argues AI is finally mature enough to change the math.
What’s Changing
AI models are now being deployed across the full reverse chain:
- Predicting which orders are likely to be returned before they ship
• Flagging high-risk SKUs or customer segments
• Automating triage decisions (restock, refurbish, liquidate, recycle)
• Optimizing routing so returned goods flow to the highest-value node
• Using computer vision to assess condition without manual inspection
Instead of a blanket “send it back to the warehouse” approach, AI enables SKU-level and unit-level decisioning in near real time.
The shift is from reactive processing to predictive management.
Why It Matters
Reverse logistics directly erodes contribution margin. But it also impacts customer lifetime value, inventory accuracy, and working capital.
The hidden cost is velocity. The longer returned inventory sits idle, the less likely it is to reenter sellable stock at full price.
AI changes three levers:
Speed: faster disposition decisions
Recovery rate: better resale or refurb value
Prevention: reducing avoidable returns upstream
In marketplaces and omnichannel retail, where returns are structurally high, even a few percentage points of improvement meaningfully impact EBITDA.
And there is a secondary effect: sustainability pressure. Regulators and consumers increasingly scrutinize waste. Intelligent routing and refurbishment reduce landfill exposure and improve ESG positioning.
What To Do Now
If you operate in a high-return category, quantify your true reverse margin impact. Many brands under-measure this.
Evaluate where AI can plug in:
Start with demand prediction and SKU-level return propensity modeling.
Then move to automated disposition rules.
Finally, optimize routing and node placement.
Marketplace brands should also review return reason data inside Amazon and Walmart dashboards. That data is often under-leveraged.
Returns data is product feedback at scale.
Bigger Picture Signal
Forward logistics has been optimized for decades. Reverse logistics has not.
AI is forcing parity.
The companies that win will treat returns not as friction, but as a data-rich operational layer. The brands that ignore it will continue to leak margin quietly.
In a margin-compressed retail environment, quiet leaks are no longer tolerable.
Team News | CHFA NOW Vancouver Update
CHFA NOW Vancouver delivered strong operator-level conversations this week.
The tone on the floor was optimistic but disciplined. Margin conversations are front and center. Retail expansion is happening, but with more structure, more data, and less speculation than in prior years.
A consistent theme: brands are validating demand digitally before stepping into broader retail distribution. Online traction is no longer optional. It is the proof point that earns shelf space.
We are excited about the interviews captured for our upcoming From Digital to Retail segment launching in March.
Shout Out To:
Kettle & Fire
Lazy Daisy
Goldrop
Neo Naturelle
Each team is navigating the digital-to-retail transition in a different way. The insights are practical, grounded, and highly relevant for brands evaluating expansion.
Looking forward to sharing the full conversations soon.
Shrinkflation Gets All The Headlines
But the real story is bigger — and smarter.
This Planet Money piece breaks down what’s actually happening in grocery: price pack architecture.
It’s not just that packages are shrinking.
They’re multiplying.
Same product.
More sizes.
More price points.
More use-case positioning.
Coca-Cola helped pioneer this in the U.S. with the mini can. Not by changing the formula — but by changing the format.
Smaller cans = calorie control + premium pricing.
Bigger multi-packs = lock in household volume.
On-the-go sizes = incremental occasions.
It’s segmentation without inventing a new product.
And it’s wildly profitable.
A few operator takeaways:
- Package size is positioning
- Price thresholds matter more than unit economics
- Different sizes unlock different occasions
- Multipacks defend share
- Smaller packs protect price perception
Shrinkflation is not random. It’s usually about protecting a key price point like $4.99 or $9.99.
The deeper play is this: when population growth slows, you stop chasing new customers and start engineering new buying behaviors.
More occasions.
More formats.
More ways to justify the same product.
If you’re building on Amazon, Walmart, or Target, this matters.
Retail buyers don’t just look at velocity.
They look at your price-pack architecture.
Are you giving them:
- An entry price point?
- A trade-up option?
- A bulk defensive pack?
- A channel-specific format?
The shelf is a chessboard.
And packaging is one of the most underrated growth levers in CPG.
Most brands obsess over branding and ads.
The quiet money is often in the pack size.
Bath & Body Works is launching on Amazon U.S.
For years, they stayed off. Controlled distribution. Owned the customer relationship. Protected brand equity through stores and DTC.
Now they’re stepping onto the largest digital shelf in the world.
That’s not casual.
A few operator-level reads on this move:
First — Amazon is no longer viewed as “brand dilution” by legacy retailers. It’s distribution infrastructure. If you want incremental reach, Prime solves that fast.
Second — this is likely controlled. Expect a curated assortment, tight pricing discipline, and brand-registered enforcement. This isn’t a fire-sale strategy. It’s channel expansion with guardrails.
Third — customer acquisition costs are brutal across paid media. Amazon already owns high-intent traffic. For a brand like Bath & Body Works, this becomes incremental demand capture, not just brand awareness.
Fourth — inventory leverage. If they manage it well, Amazon becomes a sell-through valve during peak seasons.
The bigger theme:
Even historically brick-and-mortar dominant brands are acknowledging that omnichannel now includes Amazon — whether you like it or not.
The question is no longer “Should we be on Amazon?”
It’s:
How do we show up in a way that protects brand equity, margin, and pricing architecture?
If Bath & Body Works can make the math work, expect more legacy retailers to follow.
Control the channel — or the channel controls you.
This will be one to watch.
Tariff Whiplash Isn’t Over — Expect More Volatility
Even though the Supreme Court struck down the sweeping IEEPA tariffs, experts are warning this could actually lead to more tariff actions and continued disruption.
Why?
The ruling removes one legal tool — it doesn’t remove the administration’s ability (or incentive) to use others. Section 301, 232, and now Section 122 are still in play. Each has different limits, timelines, and legal exposure.
For us as eCommerce operators, here’s what matters:
- Pricing volatility isn’t going away
• Sourcing shifts may continue
• Margin models need to stay flexible
• Inventory bets carry more risk
The biggest issue isn’t the tariff itself.
It’s unpredictability.
When policy changes quickly, brands hesitate on inventory, delay POs, adjust pricing late, and compress margins to stay competitive. That affects marketplace velocity, ad efficiency, and profitability.
Action mindset for our team:
- Keep watching landed cost assumptions
- Stress-test pricing in case of sudden cost shifts
- Stay close to brand partners on forward inventory planning
- Protect contribution margin, not just top-line growth
Bottom line: Relief headline. Ongoing instability underneath.
We operate assuming volatility — not stability.
Tired of scrolling? Give your eyes a break!
This week on Selling on Giants: Weekly eCommerce News & Updates:
Supreme Court Kills Tariffs: Refund Opportunities, Margin Impact & What’s Next for Amazon Sellers
Stay sharp and in the know — all in under 10 minutes.
🎧Now streaming on Buzzsprout and YouTube.
If you operate on Amazon, Walmart, or other major marketplaces, completing the form below is the first step to understanding what’s changing, why it matters, and how to stay ahead as the rules tighten.
One of our eCommerce experts will review your information and share practical recommendations you can put into action right away.
No pressure. Just real advice tailored to your goals.
Fill out the form below, and let’s start growing your eCommerce business together.